An advice column for people who live with people who live for sports
What is the Most Challenging Ball Sport? The Least?
Dear Sports Fan,
What do you consider the most physically challenging sport that involves a ball? The least?
Thanks, Crystal
— — —
Okay, so bocce is not the most physically challenging... but is it a sport?
Hey Crystal,
I’m glad you said “physically challenging” rather than simply “challenging.” That makes this a much easier question for me to answer because it rules out baseball. Baseball (only nominally a sport as far as I’m concerned) is extremely technically challenging but virtually no one would say it is the most physically challenging sport. I’m glad you specified that the sport should involve a ball because that rules out hockey, ballet, and cycling. All three of those sports are incredibly physically grueling often to the point of seriously damaging the people who play them.
The most physically challenging ball sport has to be water polo. I know I’ve mentioned water polo before so attentive readers may be thinking that I just have a thing for water polo. But seriously — imagine swimming and treading water for 32 minutes.[1] That’s exhausting enough! Now add playing a sport which involves a lot of time treading water without your hands and arms and tons of times when you drive yourself up out of the water to catch, throw, and block the ball. To that add violence. Tons of violence. Here is an article from the Washington Post written during the 2004 olympics that describes this pretty well:
Water polo players launch themselves out of the water to shoot.
Through the murk of the water, you see elbows swung into guts, knees slammed into groins, hands yanking bathing suits into painful wedgies, guys simply swimming on top of an opponent and holding him under water until he fights his way, punching and kicking, to the surface. Technically, none of this stuff is legal, but the refs working the poolside allow a certain amount of leeway.
The least physically challenging sport is actually a harder question because being physically challenging is one of the elements that usually helps distinguish between a game and a sport. For instance, though many of you might think I was going to argue for golf as the least challenging sport, I would say that if you count golf as a sport, you should count bocce! And bocce is much less physically challenging than golf.[2] No need to limber up to hit a ball hundreds of feet in bocce. No “walking the course” for 72 holes over four days. Bocce consists of throwing not that heavy balls not that far towards an even smaller, lighter ball.
One of the best five baseball players in the world.TIME FOR TEA!!!
If you exclude bocce, golf, pool, darts, and try to find a true sport sport which is pretty easy to play, then I think it’s probably got to be cricket. I don’t know that much about cricket but I do know that test cricket is played over up to five days. During each day “there are usually three two-hour sessions, with a forty minute break for ‘lunch’ and a twenty minute break for ‘tea’.” I am sure cricket takes an enormous amount of skill and it’s hard to argue that baseball (a sport where one of it’s best players looks like this) is more physically demanding… but…. well, what do you think?
Great question! Ezra Fischer
Footnotes (↵ returns to text)
There are four eight-minute quarters in water polo although because the clock stops on fouls and when the ball goes out of bounds, most quarters actually last around 12 minutes. Players will continue to tread water even when the clock has stopped. We hope.↵
If you think of physically challenging as requiring the most athletic performances I always thought Basketball has the best athletes. You can count Golf as a sport. That would be the least. If you just mean how hard it is on the body, probably Football is the most, Golf again the least.
And come on. Baseball is a sport. CC may be fat, but the man is a serious athlete. And I am a Red Sox fan.
Oh fine, I guess Baseball is a sport. It’s just got a lot of standing around not doing anything for a sport… Football is definitely up there but I think it may be more physically damaging than challenging. To put it another way — who would you bet on: a team of water polo players playing football or a team of football players playing water polo?
Well you have to add the fact that water polo players dont get a break, football players play for about 10 seconds then wait another 30 seconds, then do the same thing over, non stop swimming is harder.
Thanks for pondering my inquiry, Ez–I enjoy reading the column!
Thanks for reading Crystal!!!
If you think of physically challenging as requiring the most athletic performances I always thought Basketball has the best athletes. You can count Golf as a sport. That would be the least. If you just mean how hard it is on the body, probably Football is the most, Golf again the least.
And come on. Baseball is a sport. CC may be fat, but the man is a serious athlete. And I am a Red Sox fan.
Oh fine, I guess Baseball is a sport. It’s just got a lot of standing around not doing anything for a sport… Football is definitely up there but I think it may be more physically damaging than challenging. To put it another way — who would you bet on: a team of water polo players playing football or a team of football players playing water polo?
Well you have to add the fact that water polo players dont get a break, football players play for about 10 seconds then wait another 30 seconds, then do the same thing over, non stop swimming is harder.